Grutter v bollinger case summary the united state supreme court case of grutter v bollinger (539 us 306, (2003) is a case which upheld the affirmative action admissions policy of the university of michigan law school the united states supreme court was announced the extremely tight decision of 5-4 on june 23, 2003.
Facts the university of michigan law school (defendant) receives more than 3,500 applications each year for a class of 350 students the law school’s (defendant) admissions committee tried to achieve diversity in the student body by requiring admissions officials to evaluate each applicant based on all the information in the file, including a personal statement, letters of recommendation, a. Thank you for registering as a pre-law student with casebriefs™ as a pre-law student you are automatically registered for the casebriefs™ lsat prep course.
Grutter v bollinger et al, (2003) no 02-241 argued: april 1, 2003 decided: june 23, 2003 the university of michigan law school (law school), one of the nation's top law schools, follows an official admissions policy that seeks to achieve student body diversity through compliance with regents of univ of cal v.
As shown in grutter and predecessor supreme court decisions, not every decision influenced by race is equally objectionable, and “strict scrutiny” is designed to provide a framework for carefully examining the importance and the sincerity of the reasons advanced by the governmental decisionmaker for the use of race in any given context. The university of michigan law school (law school) implemented in 1992 an admissions policy that gave applicants belonging to certain racial minority groups a greater chance of admission than students with similar credentials from other racial groups.
In the cases grutter v bollinger and gratz v bollinger (2003), the supreme court ruled that the use of affirmative action in school admission is constitutional if it treats race as one factor.
No 02—241 barbara grutter, petitioner v lee bollinger et al on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit [june 23, 2003.